Across the United States, AI regulation is evolving quickly but not randomly. While state laws vary in scope, applicability, and mechanics, they are converging on a shared principle: AI systems

In the last two installments of Legal Lines Around AI, we examined how transparency and consumer rights work together to give individuals greater control over how businesses use high‑risk AI

In our last Legal Lines Around AI post, we explored how emerging AI laws increasingly rely on disclosure obligations as a front‑line consumer protection tool. But this is only the

Disclosures are a central regulatory requirement across consumer protection laws to promote transparency, fairness, and accountability. In this third installment of Legal Lines Around AI, we examine how emerging AI

Under comprehensive AI laws, one question largely determines a company’s regulatory exposure: are you developing or deploying an AI system that qualifies as “high risk”? In this second installment of

Welcome to Legal Lines Around AI, a six‑part blog series exploring how AI laws are taking shape in the United States and what those changes mean for businesses using, building,

California has delivered its clearest message yet on what “opt out” actually means under the California Consumer Protection Act (CCPA). In a $2.75 million settlement with the Walt Disney Company—the

California’s Attorney General recently announced a settlement with Sling TV over alleged violations of the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA). While the details of this case echo themes we’ve seen

On October 1, 2025, the Maryland Online Data Privacy Act (MODPA) became effective, joining the growing list of states with comprehensive consumer data privacy laws. With enforcement beginning April 1,

In a sharply worded opinion, U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria recently granted summary judgment in favor of the Eating Recovery Center (ERC) in a privacy lawsuit that has reignited debate